Capability rankings for DGX Spark owners

The best open models that fit on your Sparks

Ranked on Cybench, CyberGym, LiveCodeBench, SWE-bench Pro, Terminal-Bench. Each model is shown with the recipe your cluster can run, and a score only counts if it was measured on that exact model version and build.

How many Sparks do you have?

More Sparks can unlock other recipes, and run the same recipe faster

Best picks for 1 Spark

Every pick is on the frontier: nothing that fits is both faster and more capable

No picks yet: not enough scores to draw the frontier

None of the 11 recipes that fit 1 Spark has scores that count on 3 of the 5 benchmarks it needs to be ranked overall, so none can be placed on the chart. Each one appears here at its measured decode speed once it does.

10 of the 11 already have a decode speed measured on 1 Spark; what’s missing is scores on their exact builds.

Submit a score
01

Leaderboard

9 models · 0 of 45 scores count for these recipes

Counts percentile among models that fitno mark: developer-reported · ● independent · ○ another lab’s table · ◆ run on a Spark
Shown, not ranked@BF16 other buildname other model versionv2.0 other test versionsubset partial test not reported
# Model Recipe
for 1 Spark
Counted
Not ranked: fewer than 3 of 5 benchmarks count for this recipe
– Laguna S 2.1
poolside · 118B · 8B active
poolside NVFP4poolside1 Spark · 71 GB77 t/s
—
0/5 · +2 ———59.4@BF1670.2@BF16
– Ling-3.0-flash
inclusionAI · 124B · 5.1B active
inclusionAI INT4inclusionAI1 Spark83 t/s
—
0/5 · +3 ——84.0●@BF1656.6@BF1650.2●@BF16
– Muse Glimmer 30B
Meta Superintelligence Lab · 29.6B · 29.6B active
Red Hat NVFP4Red Hat AI1 Spark · 19 GB35 t/s
—
0/5 · +2 ———51.2@BF1651.7●@BF16
– Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B
NVIDIA · 74B · 9B active
NVIDIA 24GB packNVIDIA1 Spark · 24 GB71 t/s
—
0/5 · +1 ————51.02.1
– Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
NVIDIA · 30B · 3B active
NVIDIA NVFP4NVIDIA1 Spark
—
0/5 · +1 ————23.52.1
– Ornith-1.5-122B
Ornith AI · 125.09B
Mia's EXL3 EAQ 4-bitMia's AI Lab1 Spark · 67 GB53 t/s
—
0/5 · +3 —80.0@BF16—76.9@BF1681.2@BF16
– Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Qwen · 35B · 3B active
Unsloth NVFP4Unsloth1 Spark95 t/s
—
0/5 · +3 ——80.4@BF1649.5@BF160.0●@BF16
– Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen · 27.8B · 27.8B active
Vontra MLX 4-bitVontra1 Spark · 19 GB58 t/s · +1 more
—
0/5 · +3 ——90.3@BF1661.7@BF1669.4●@NVFP4
– Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen · 180B · 6B active
NVIDIA FP4-LocalNVIDIA1 Spark · 103 GB56 t/s · +1 more
—
0/5 · +3 ——95.0●@NVFP462.9●@BF1686.4●@NVFP4

Index: the mean of a recipe’s percentiles, among the models that fit, across the benchmarks that count for it. A recipe needs 3 of 5 to be ranked. Dashed cells were measured on a different build, model version, test version or a subset, and are left out. Hover a score for its source; click a column to sort by it.

02

How complete the grid is

Of 45 possible scores for the 9 models that fit 1 Spark, 0 were measured on the recipe’s exact model and build. Another 21 exist but were measured on something else.

  1. Cybench0 / 9
  2. CyberGym0 +1 / 9
  3. LiveCodeBench0 +4 / 9
  4. SWE-bench Pro0 +7 / 9
  5. Terminal-Bench0 +9 / 9
03

Scores we need next

Benchmarks that don’t yet count for the top recipes. A run on the recipe’s exact build, on a Spark, is the most useful contribution.